Can a minor child or mentally impaired individual be held liable for intentional torts?

Study for the Georgia Torts Bar Exam with our comprehensive quizzes. Use flashcards and multiple choice questions, each with detailed explanations and tips to enhance your learning. Get ready to excel!

A minor child or mentally impaired individual can indeed be held liable for intentional torts if they acted with the requisite mental state. This means that if the individual is capable of forming the intent required for the action, such as intending to cause a specific outcome or engaging in conduct that fulfills the elements of an intentional tort, they can be held responsible for their actions.

In tort law, the focus is on the mental state at the time of the act. If a minor or mentally impaired individual can demonstrate that they understood the nature of their actions and the consequences that followed, they can potentially face liability. This recognizes that not all minors or individuals with mental impairments are categorically incapable of understanding or controlling their actions to the extent that they evade liability completely.

Other options discuss restrictive conditions, such as requiring premeditation, involvement of an adult, or blanket exclusions based on age or mental disability, none of which correctly reflect the legal standards governing intentional torts. The law acknowledges the capacity of individuals, including minors or those with mental impairments, to be liable if they fulfill specific criteria relating to intent.

Subscribe

Get the latest from Examzify

You can unsubscribe at any time. Read our privacy policy