How does the doctrine of transferred intent apply in cases of IIED?

The doctrine of transferred intent is relevant to tort cases, particularly in distinguishing how intent can shift from one person to another. In cases of Intentional Infliction of Emotional Distress (IIED), the doctrine does not apply if a different tort is intended. This is because transferred intent traditionally covers certain torts that involve direct harm to persons, such as assault or battery.

In IIED cases, if the defendant intended to commit a different tort against a specific individual but inadvertently caused emotional distress to another person, the intent does not transfer to the IIED claim. This specifically highlights that the claim for IIED requires intent to cause emotional harm, not just any tortious action aimed at someone else. Therefore, a plaintiff claiming IIED lacks a viable cause of action if the original intent was focused on a different tort, as the emotional distress element needs its own basis of intentionality.

Thus, recognizing that IIED requires a specific intent linked directly to the emotional harm suffered aligns with the reasoning reflected in the answer provided. Understanding this guidance is essential for effectively navigating claims relating to IIED and recognizing the boundaries of transferred intent within tort law.