How is intentionality established in the context of intentional torts?

Intentionality in the context of intentional torts is established when it can be shown that the defendant acted with purpose or knowledge of the intended consequences of their actions. This means that for a claim of intentional tort to succeed, it is necessary to demonstrate that the defendant had a specific intent to bring about a particular result or was aware that their actions could result in that outcome.

In tort law, the concept of intent is not limited to wanting to cause harm; it also includes knowledge that such harm is likely to occur as a result of the defendant's actions. This understanding of intentionality aligns with the broader legal principles governing intentional torts, where the motives behind an action are critically examined to determine liability.

The other choices do not accurately capture the legal standards for establishing intentionality in this context. Acting randomly does not demonstrate intent or awareness of the action's consequences. Acting with just knowledge of the risk would pertain more to negligence rather than intentionality. An accidental cause of harm clearly fails to satisfy the requirement for intent, as intentional torts necessitate a purposeful or knowledgeable act leading to a specific result.