In terms of multiple defendants in negligence claims, what is typically assessed?

In negligence claims involving multiple defendants, the assessment of the total negligence of all defendants combined is a key element. This means that the court looks at the collective actions and levels of negligence from each defendant as they relate to the plaintiff's injury.

In a situation where multiple parties may share fault, Georgia follows a comparative negligence framework, allowing the jury to return a verdict that reflects the percentage of fault attributable to each defendant. This approach facilitates an equitable distribution of liability based on each party's level of negligence relative to the plaintiff’s injuries.

When assessing the totality of negligence from all defendants, the damages awarded to the plaintiff can be influenced significantly since the analysis considers their cumulative impact, rather than isolating each defendant's conduct. This combined assessment can provide clearer accountability for all parties involved in the negligence claim.

Other options do not accurately represent the legal framework utilized in Georgia for assessing negligence among multiple defendants, which is why they fall short in this context.