In the context of products liability, which statement is true?

In products liability cases, the concept of causation often hinges on the idea that multiple parties might be involved in the production and distribution of a product. The correct assertion highlights that causation can be established even when several different actors are involved in the manufacturing process, as long as some form of negligence can be demonstrated during production.

This is based on the principle that if a product is defective due to negligence—whether from the manufacturer, a supplier, or any other party involved in its creation—there's a strong inference that the defect caused the harm experienced by the consumer. Courts can utilize a theory of joint and several liability, holding different parties responsible if they contributed negligently to a product's defect.

This approach recognizes the complexities of modern manufacturing, where a product may pass through numerous stages and many hands before reaching the consumer. Therefore, courts often accept evidence that establishes negligence at any point in that chain as sufficient to establish causation for liability, thus making option C the correct answer.

In contrast, the other statements present more rigid criteria that do not align with how courts typically apply principles of products liability. For instance, requiring all parties to have exclusive control would overlook the realities of shared manufacturing responsibilities, and requiring conclusive proof of negligence from the