Under what condition might a court grant injunctive relief for a nuisance?

Injunctive relief is a remedy that a court may grant to prevent further harm from a nuisance when it is deemed necessary to protect the rights of the affected party. The correct answer highlights that courts often consider the likelihood of the nuisance continuing and the inadequacy of monetary damages as key factors for granting injunctive relief.

When a nuisance is ongoing, and its continuation would likely cause harm that cannot be adequately addressed through financial compensation, the court recognizes that a more immediate and effective solution is warranted. This is particularly true when the nuisance poses a threat of ongoing or future harm that cannot be quantified or mitigated through monetary damages alone. For example, situations involving ongoing noise, pollution, or other persistent disturbances may warrant an injunction since stopping the offending behavior is essential to prevent further harm.

In contrast, if the nuisance has already ceased, as mentioned in another option, the need for an injunction diminishes because the threat of future harm has been eliminated. Similarly, if monetary damages are determined to be sufficient to compensate the plaintiff for the harm caused, the court is less likely to resort to an injunction. Lastly, if there has been no harm suffered by the plaintiff, an injunction would likely not be warranted since equitable relief typically seeks to address ongoing or potential