What is the effect of brief dispossession of chattels?

The selection of the option indicating that a brief dispossession of chattels could still constitute a trespass to chattels is grounded in the legal principles related to property rights and possession. In tort law, trespass to chattels occurs when one party intentionally interferes with another person's lawful possession of a chattel, even if the interference is temporary.

A brief dispossession does not negates the owner's rights nor does it require permanent dispossession to be actionable. The law recognizes that even a short period during which a person is deprived of their property can result in annoyance, distress, and inconvenience, making it actionable as a trespass. The focus is on the interference with possession rather than the duration of the dispossession itself. Thus, an owner can pursue a claim for trespass even if they regain possession quickly, affirming that possession rights are protected under the law regardless of how long the dispossession lasts.