What is true about proving damages in false imprisonment cases?

In false imprisonment cases, the truth about proving damages lies in the concept of nominal damages. When a plaintiff demonstrates that they have been falsely imprisoned, they can recover nominal damages even if they cannot prove actual harm or physical injury sustained during the confinement. Nominal damages serve to recognize the violation of the plaintiff's rights, emphasizing that the act of false imprisonment itself is sufficient to warrant a legal remedy.

This principle allows for the acknowledgment of the wrong done, validating the plaintiff's experience, even when tangible damages are not evident. It's a crucial aspect of tort law, highlighting that the mere infringement of personal liberties is enough to establish liability and recover some form of compensation. Thus, the option regarding nominal damages reflects an essential component of false imprisonment claims in torts.