What must be proven to establish a prima facie case for strict liability?

To establish a prima facie case for strict liability, the focus is on proving an absolute duty, causation, and damages. Strict liability holds a party responsible for their actions or products without the need to prove negligence or intent. This legal doctrine typically applies in cases involving abnormally dangerous activities or defective products.

Proving an absolute duty means that the defendant had a legal obligation to ensure safety in the specific context of the activity or item in question. Causation requires showing that the defendant's action or product directly caused the harm or injury to the plaintiff. Finally, establishing damages involves demonstrating that the plaintiff suffered actual harm or loss as a result of the defendant's actions or product defects.

The other options address concepts that do not align with the requirements for strict liability. Reasonable care and supervision relate more to negligence rather than strict liability. Intentional misconduct is irrelevant in strict liability cases, which do not require proof of intent or wrongdoing. Lastly, foreseeability of risk is typically a consideration in negligence claims, not in strict liability, where the focus is on the nature of the activity or product itself rather than the foreseeability of the harm.