When does transferred intent not apply according to tort law?

Transferred intent in tort law typically allows for intent to be redirected from one tort to another, but its application has limitations. One of those limitations is evident when distinguishing between different types of intentional torts, particularly when the original intent does not align with the nature of the new tort.

In this case, if a person intends to commit an intentional tort, such as battery, but instead causes a property tort, like trespass to chattels, the doctrine of transferred intent does not apply. This is because the legal framework seeks to ensure that the actor's intent aligns with the resulting tortious harm. The intent associated with an intentional tort cannot simply be transferred to a different category, such as from person to property.

This distinction is crucial in tort law as it helps to maintain the integrity of intent and prevents the unfair application of liability where the actor had no specific intention to commit an act that results in a property-related harm. Thus, in instances where the intended offense transitions from a person-related offense to a property-related offense, transferred intent is inapplicable.