Which duty does a land possessor NOT have towards a licensee?

In the context of tort law, particularly regarding the duties a land possessor owes to different types of entrants onto their property, the correct choice highlights an essential distinction in the responsibilities owed to a licensee. A licensee is someone who enters a property with the permission of the owner, but does not provide an economic benefit to the possessor, such as social guests.

The duty that a land possessor does NOT have towards a licensee is the duty to inspect for dangers. This means that while the land possessor must address known dangers and provide warnings about concealed dangers that the licensee may not be aware of, they are not legally obligated to proactively inspect the property for potential hazards. This duty to inspect primarily applies to invitees, who are owed a higher standard of care due to their business relationship with the landowner.

By understanding this distinction, it becomes clear that while a land possessor should take reasonable steps to ensure the safety of a licensee upon discovering hazards, they are not required to undertake regular inspections or maintenance to identify potential dangers. This limitation of duty reflects the nature of a licensee's relationship with the property possessor, which is less stringent than the obligations owed to invitees.