Which of the following is NOT a basis for compensatory damages in negligence claims?

Compensatory damages in negligence claims are intended to make the injured party whole for the harm they've suffered as a result of another's negligence. These damages typically cover various aspects of the harm experienced by the plaintiff.

Initial physical harm is a primary basis for compensatory damages, as it directly reflects the injury suffered due to the negligent act. Subsequent harm traceable to the initial harm also qualifies for compensation since it is a natural consequence of the initial injury and stems directly from the defendant's negligence. Additionally, the steps taken to mitigate the initial harm, often referred to as "mitigation of damages," are relevant since the law encourages plaintiffs to take reasonable actions to minimize their losses following an injury.

The previous actions of the plaintiff before the negligence, however, do not serve as a basis for compensatory damages. Instead, they may be examined in terms of contributory negligence or assumption of risk, which could potentially reduce the damages awarded but do not constitute a basis for recovering them. Thus, this option stands out as not fitting the scheme of compensatory damages in negligence claims.