Which of the following scenarios could exemplify intermeddling with a chattel?

Intermeddling with a chattel involves an unauthorized interference with a person's possession of their property, which can lead to liability for conversion or trespass to chattels. In the given scenarios, kicking a friend's dog in annoyance clearly exemplifies intermeddling. This act not only constitutes an unauthorized physical interference with the dog's personhood but also may cause harm or distress to the animal and potentially damage the owner's property rights.

In contrast, borrowing a friend's book without telling them may imply a lack of permission but does not typically involve significant interference; it usually falls under a more favorable interpretation of borrowing if the intention is to return it. Catching a glimpse of someone's possession is passive and does not involve any physical interaction or harm. Taking a neighbor's tool without permission, while also unauthorized, is more closely aligned with theft rather than the specific concept of intermeddling, which emphasizes interference and negatively impacting the owner's control over their chattel. Thus, kicking the dog is the most appropriate example illustrating intermeddling with a chattel.